Leg Hair Removal: is Nair worth it?
Posted in Hair by: adminAugust 1st, 2008
I’ve gotten rid of my mammoth leg hair by shaving my legs. Always. But lately I’ve been curious about Nair/Veet and those types of hair removals. Do they really last longer? Eliminate stubble? I always have stubble, even right after I shave. Gross. Does it hurt/ smell bad like some people say?
Also, do they have sensitive versions? Do they work as well?
Thanks all 
August 1st, 2008 at 3:14 pm
well as for smell its pretty bad, like a perm, but you get used to it i guess. i’d say its not worth it. you should only nair if your legs are reallly hairy. because if you only have little hair, all the hair will not be removed. i think nair is a waste of time and that nair should only be used for armpits. =]
good luck
August 3rd, 2008 at 9:02 pm
Nair smells terrible, but so does the veet. I used veet and liked it better!
August 4th, 2008 at 8:56 pm
I have used Nair for over 20 years and it’s even better than when I first started with it. It doesn’t leave stubble, bumps and you don’t get nicked either. It doesn’t have as much of a smell as it used to have and leaves your legs feeling smooth. Use exactly as the directions state. I would never use it under my arms, tho.